Be very, very careful where you work if you’re a woman. Check on the religious beliefs of your employer. The Supreme Court has ruled that closely-held corporations are protected under RFRA which is kind of like the Free Exercise Clause on steroids. But it’s only reproductive coverage that can be refused on religious grounds. So, if you’re a guy, you’re fine. Get that transplant, get that transfusion, get those meds, get that vaccination. No religious objections are valid in those instances. As usual for this majority though, the men know what’s best for women, and that is to not have access to the full range of health care options that women need. Ironically, the majority notes that the ruling can’t be used to couch illegal discrimination behind religious belief. But the decision is all about the legality of discriminating against women. And as for the notion that this do-nothing, obstructionist Congress will suddenly allow the Affordable Care Act to be amended to cover contraception so that employees of these devout corporations will have access to medical care? We may be waiting for a very long time.
This is also a problematic development for law governing corporations. If owners and their corporations are no longer separate entities, what of taxation? What of liability? Or will owners have it both ways?
It’s a brave new world. RFRA rules.