you're reading...

The Other Religion Clause (and a Very Brief Account of Why It’s Still Important)

They’re still praying in Greece. That’s Greece, New York, a suburb of Rochester. Last November the Supreme Court heard arguments in the case of Town of Greece v. Susan Galloway and Linda Stephens. For years the monthly meetings of the town board opened with a moment of silence, but in 1999, the new town supervisor decided meetings should be opened with a prayer. Since then, with the exception of four meetings, each session has been preceded by Christian prayers offered by various local religious leaders. A majority of the prayers invoke the name of Jesus Christ, and many clergy have delved deeply into explanations of Christian theology and the significance of Christian beliefs and holidays. All of this before town board meetings at which students are honored, new police and fire officials are sworn in, and people come to have their civic concerns addressed and petitions heard. Susan Galloway and Linda Stephens are active members of their community and regularly attend town board meetings. One of them Jewish and the other an atheist, both were uncomfortable with the prayers held at the beginning of meetings and felt marginalized for not participating. Over the years, they have been chastised for their non-participation and told that if they didn’t like the prayers, they could leave. One guest chaplain said they were “in the minority and were ignorant of the history of our country.” When they filed a lawsuit challenging this practice, they became targets of threats and hostile actions. Although the US District Court ruled for the town, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit unanimously held that the town had affiliated itself with a single religion in violation of the Constitution’s First Amendment. The Town of Greece appealed, and the Supreme Court has yet to issue its decision.

While non-sectarian prayers before state legislative sessions have been deemed constitutional, there is a vast difference between those types of proceedings and local government meetings which are inherently more intimate and provide visibility for community members who attend, and even more exposure for those who speak publicly at such gatherings. Will a majority of the justices hold that offering prayers from one unique religious tradition at town meetings is endorsement? And will the Court identify this type of coercion and pressure by a government body to follow a particular religious philosophy or be ostracized, as precisely the type of abuse the Establishment Clause was meant to prohibit? We should find out soon. Meanwhile, from a podium bearing the seal of the Town of Greece, the preaching goes on.



About legalfeet

I'm an essayist, commentator, lawyer and reporter with expertise in Constitutional Law, United States History, religion and public education. I cover current issues involving the First Amendment religion clauses, modern religious movements, scientific history and developments and the events in which these areas converge.


No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


© Robin Radner and Legalfeet, 2017. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Robin Radner and Legalfeet with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
%d bloggers like this: